The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar  ⨹ 19:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Prithviraj Sankhala

Prithviraj Sankhala (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mid level civil servant. Not notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. The references do not support the article and make only marginal references to him and are not enough. Uncletomwood ( talk) 12:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 12:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 12:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - agree with nom - non notable civil servant, just doing his job Gbawden ( talk) 07:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 01:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - A couple high quality RSs here, but only passing mention rather than direct coverage. The creator of this article seems to have made other BLPs which were deleted. NickCT ( talk) 16:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.