The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Promotional article. Company fails notability. Absolutely no info from trusted or notable sources, all google results are general ones relating to it being a registered British company and absolutely nothing else.
Rayman60 (
talk) 00:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, I do not see any notability as per
WP:N.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 00:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now unfortunately as although its age and history would've certainly guaranteed a notable and acceptable article, my searches found nothing better than coverage including like what's currently listed, at News and browsers. Absolutely nothing to suggest a currently better article. Notifying past users
DGG and
Unforgettableid (even though the latter seems to be not entirely active).
SwisterTwistertalk 06:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.