- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Prateek Bhardwaj
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Prateek Bhardwaj ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable software/business professional. References seems to be written in poor prose (Case in point (this - https://www.dailypioneer.com/2016/state-editions/meet-the-all-in-one.html) which reads like a 10 year old's work. Most of the references seem like paid for corporate inserts. The person is not to be confused with another CEO with the same name who has been getting a lot of press. Jupitus Smart 18:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC) Jupitus Smart 18:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT and WP:MILL. Content and cites need too much work in copyediting to be bothered with a run of the mill business person, one of 100 million in India alone. Bearian ( talk) 13:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - reads a lot like this was written by a WP:COI or WP:PAID editor - even the "controversy" is worded in such a way as to be incredibly positive. Even if this was salvageable, which I suspect it is not due to independent notability concerns, it would basically need a complete reset. Red Phoenix talk 15:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.