The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Comments show a near even divide here (I am discounting the SPA). Nor is an examination of the arguments based on
WP:PAG helpful as both sides are looking at the same sources and citing the same guidelines (and essay). IMO a further relisting is unlikely to bear fruit. I am declaring a hung jury and a mistrial.
Ad Orientem (
talk) 00:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
I was reading this article and found deletion message. By reading this I have not found any promotion content here and in this article have enough known citations. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
146.196.34.242 (
talk) 09:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC) —
146.196.34.242 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Delete not yet notable per
WP:GOLDENRULE,
WP:BIO, or
WP:GNG. Significant, independent coverage from
WP:RS is need to meet those criteria, not brief mentions in
WP:RS about her giving a lecture, nor obvious paid puff pieces like these:
[1],
[2] aren't the kind of coverage required to show notability.
WP:TOOSOON at best.
TMGtalk 18:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
StrikerforceTalk 20:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: does not meet
WP:ANYBIO /
WP:NAUTHOR; significant RS coverage not found. SPA activity at this AfD is concerning as well.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 01:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: Absolutely meets GNG. If it would have been a draft, I would have accepted it at AfC.
Dial911 (
talk) 03:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.