The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 11:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete You beat me to it, I was just about to add Tall Orange to the nom as well. All are unreferenced original research, even considering the link provided as a reference, it's a wiki and not a reliable source as a result.
RadioFan (
talk) 14:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Redirect all the others to
Anything Muppet and encourage the author to add to that article (not just create lists). -
Richard Cavell (
talk) 14:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
I would support that, except that the sources used to make the Muppet Wiki page are not specified. -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 15:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not seeing how
Anything Muppet could meet notability requirements either. They all appear to be original research culled from an external wiki.--
RadioFan (
talk) 15:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete quite a few of the Muppets are notable, but these aren't even characters, just parts used to make various extremely-minor muppets.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete and possibly merge with the Anything Muppet page. Muppet Wiki does have more information, though.
Schfifty3 05:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.