The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mailer Diablo 02:02, 24 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, nn, POV fork. --
Terence Ong 05:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per all above.
Sandstein 06:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as non-notable dicdef protologism. (As an aside to Grandmasterka, I think they argue that holograms were used to create an illusion of planes. Now I'm going to go put on my
Tin-foil hat.)
Esquizombi 07:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete silly conspiracycruft.
Cyde Weys 08:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, neologism.
feydey 13:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Triage 22:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.