The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –
filelakeshoe (
t /
c)
🐱 12:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I can't find significant coverage for this. While it exists, and is probably useful to users that use it, it does not appear sufficiently notable for a wikipedia article. Polyamorph (
talk) 08:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete not even a claim of notability, since no source except the project web site. Although would be nice to hear opinion of
User:Guy Harris who know more Mac.
W Nowicki (
talk) 16:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete All I did here was change it from a redirect to a no-longer-extant section of the
Safari (web browser) article to a slightly cleaned-up version of what was there before it was made such a redirect. Given that there's nothing about PithHelmet on the Safari page any more, linking there would be an error; a quick Wikipedia search didn't find anything else about "PithHelmet" (as opposed to "pith helmet") on the first page of results, so there's probably no other place to which to redirect. Unless somebody can show its notability, deletion is probably the right answer here; the only alternative I see would be for somebody to put back information about extensions from that era, including a mention of PithHelmet, back in the
Safari (web browser) article, and link there.
Guy Harris (
talk) 19:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.