The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Randykitty (
talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Non-notable film. Of sources provided, one is regarding the filmmaker, and merely mentions his newest film in the first line. The only other is from Elonet, which is a DATABASE of Finnish films which does nothing for notable, same with IMDB external link. I don't see anything establishing notability for this film.
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalenciaᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Proquest news archive search comes up absolutely blank. Film is already included in list of a dozen non-notable films on page of filmmaker
Visa Mäkinen. Thereis nothing here to merge.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 11:04, 5 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment Elonet is a database and probably lists every movie and actor in Finland, but it also has some information about this movie and it quotes three reviews from three national newspapers/magazines. Unfortunately it's probably impossible to find the reviews online so I don't know how long they are. It seems it was also reviewed in the film magazine
Filmihullu, but that's not online either
[1]. Elonet also quotes an interview about making of the movie prior to the release, but again it's impossible to find it now. Also according to Elonet, the film was released on DVD in 2009 and 2017. -
kyykaarme (
talk) 23:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep as there is evidence given above that the film has been reviewed in four national newspapers and magazines which means it passes
WP:NFILM but those sources are not easily found online so it needs Finnish editors to expand the article with offline sources
Atlantic306 (
talk) 22:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Additionally, after looking further, as per Kyykaarme, NFILM requires "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." The article shows the film sold 1 650 tickets, which would go against "widely distributed." Further, no evidence that these are "full-length" reviews, and NFILM requires both.
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalenciaᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
WP:GNG can be passed separately from
WP:NFILM and if the reviews are in national newspapers they are likely to be sig cov
Atlantic306 (
talk) 21:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: We need to find the sources as we can't keep on assertions
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 07:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.