The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable bus company, Found one indepth source
[1] with the rest being trivial mentions, Fails NCORP & GNG –
Davey2010Talk 12:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)reply
delete fails WP:CORP. Just a local bus company with no broader significance.
LibStar (
talk) 15:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Significant regional company . Rightly or wrongly, we have always been very inclusive for transportation, . DGG (
talk ) 18:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)reply
DGG - Hundreds if not thousands of bus company articles have been deleted and I don't see why this should be any different, Ofcouse if you can find any indepth and reliable sources/coverage I'd happily withdraw. –
Davey2010Talk 18:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)reply
hundreds have been deleted, and hundred kept. I have always !voted delete myself for ones running one or two routes. DGG (
talk ) 05:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)reply
DGG - Nope sorry to disagree but most have been deleted with a few being kept, With all due respect you !vote Keep on any transport article without even looking at the article or the sources (I'm not having a go but I'm just saying it how it is), As I said tho groans aside if you can provide indepth coverage I'd be more than happy to withdraw however a company running more than 2-3 routes isn't a reason to keep. –
Davey2010Talk 18:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)reply
how is it a "significant regional company"?
LibStar (
talk) 00:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment: It's only available offline and I don't have access to it right now, but I recall seeing a lot of coverage of this company in Buses magazine over the years. Perhaps someone with a complete archive could check this out, because the online sources certainly aren't sufficient. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:630:D0:ED2B:E164:B2F1:6A5E:745F (
talk) 15:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Just not enough sources to establish notability.
-- HighKing++ 20:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.