From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 06:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Pierre Le Manh

Pierre Le Manh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTCV very much applies here. ROTM business executive, tagged for promotion but not so promotional as would warrant G11, nevertheless fails WP:GNG, WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Business, France, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Can only find PR items; the Bloomberg link is in fact a republished PRNewsWire item (cleverly disguised in a RS), but not-RS. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC) reply
    Do not delete: Several of the added links are secondary links. John Munroe 1950 ( talk) 01:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)John Munroe 1950 ( talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
  • Delete essentially a string of pr announcements about appointments and promotions strung together into an article. Notability not demonstrated. Mccapra ( talk) 18:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Turns out this should have been speedy G5 as it was created by a sock of Abbasshaikh124, who was blocked back in January... Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 10:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination. I can find nothing better than what's cited already, just look-at-me interviews and passing mentions in coverage of the company. New secondary sources added by the obvious sockpuppet post above are more of this, along with one reference that doesn't even mention him. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.