The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Paid contribution by banned sockpuppet of banned editor. The subject has been engaged in a number of enterprises, none noable, and written a book, published by one of his firms DGG (
talk ) 03:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Very Weak Keep Agree with above, should be re-written to include the negative press.
Oaktree b (
talk) 14:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 06:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per reliable notability establishing source found by nearlyevil above.
Fieari (
talk) 07:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep There is a bit to be found, a bit more than just mentions and routine, and there are multiple events over time, but not really solid. Article does need some balance.
Aoziwe (
talk) 09:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.