From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Phillip Davis (businessman)

Phillip Davis (businessman) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the subject passes WP:N. Sources cite him a bit, and there are a handful of personal bio's on websites, but there's not really any significant coverage about the subject in reliable secondary sources. There are sources that talk about Tungsten Branding, but that's not the subject of this WP:BLP. Comatmebro ( talk) 04:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC) reply
KittyKatey ( talk) is the creator of the article in question.
WP:PRIMARY sources are not intellectually independent from the subject, and are the exact opposite of what we are looking for to establish notability.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 16:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep Davis technically meets WP:GNG guidelines based on sources provided. Reliable and independent citations are available. Lightningbumbum ( talk) 15:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Lightningbumbum: If better quality sources exist, they should be added to the article or shared here. However, primary sources should be avoided; for example, the source you added was written by the subject (a WP:PRIMARY issue) and is part of a paid program. SamHolt6 ( talk) 22:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - as a WP:NBIO failure. While the article cites sources, too many are centered around WP:PRIMARY information or lack the depth of coverage needed to establish the subject's notability. SamHolt6 ( talk) 16:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Though some citations are relying on WP:PRIMARY sources, there are enough sources that meet WP:N and show that Davis is notable in the branding space. 73.212.1.155 ( talk) 16:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC) reply
73.212.1.155 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete Fails WP:GOLDENRULE. Missing persistent, significant and in-depth coverage. Notabililty not established. Accesscrawl ( talk) 05:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.