The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. by User:Doc James as WP:G11, G5. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 16:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Philippe Hoerle-Guggenheim

Philippe Hoerle-Guggenheim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG has an unsupported claim to be a member of the Guggenheim family but even if this were referenced, notability is not inherited. Theroadislong ( talk) 21:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 22:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 22:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete - very likely a hoax, or perhaps even part of a fraud - in any case the claim of being part of the Guggenheim family has to be proved or there is not even a shadow of a claim to notability here. Smallbones_{( smalltalk)} 23:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete - even if he were part of the Guggenheim family, I think this subject fails notability guidelines. See WP:NOTINHERITED. Gilded Snail ( talk) 23:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete - a strange mishmash of WP:NOTINHERITED and borderline WP:BLP1E with the Alison Jackson performance art thing (two of the sources don't even mention the subject of the article). He seems to be a real person with a gallery, a knack for being photographed with celebrities, and some kind of arrest record, but that's all I can figure out with a few minutes of WP:BEFORE research. ☆ Bri ( talk) 00:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Deleted Looks like paid for spam from a sock puppet. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.