The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete I was just about to nominate it myself. There are absolutely no sources available except for
this which only contains a mention of the name (时光隧道). This is a
Xinyao group but I don't see any evidence that it is notable. There are also very few sources available to verify the information. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk) 06:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: Me three. I initially tagged this for speedy, as did
JMHamo (
talk·contribs), but we were declined by
Adam9007 (
talk·contribs) on the basis of their charting (once, at #11) in
Hong Kong. The article doesn't say how long it stayed on the charts, or, more importantly, provide any sort of source for verification, so to me this is not a very credible assertion of significance. Be that as it may, now that we have moved to AfD, I think the lack of sources is a fatal omission, especially since the article badly needs to be re-written, and this cannot be done without sources.
ubiquity (
talk) 13:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I doubt there will be sources for this.
Xinyao was more of a grassroots musical movement. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk) 08:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.