The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The sources provided by Beccaynr have remained uncontested. Sandstein 09:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Non-notable reality show participant. Keeps getting re-created from redirect. Fails GNG, absolutely no in-depth coverage about this person outside show.
Onel5969TT me 12:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete a non-notable reality televsion star. Wikipedia articles need reliable sources, not one tabloid mention.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Mild Keep I'd expect with that much TV time, there would be something written about her. The article has zero sources. I started the Shannon Singh article, she was only on Love Island UK for one episode and she got a whack of coverage. Would have to dig to find sources for this person, but I'm not interested in doing so.
Oaktree b (
talk) 19:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment I have added sources and tried to fix some aspects of the page.
Samsmachado (
talk) 20:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete trivial accomplishments -- the coverage is the typical tabloid style coverage the show was apparently designed to attract. DGG (
talk ) 18:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Nom seems to insinuate a
WP:BLP1E ("no in-depth coverage about this person outside show", presumably RHOA is the "show" in question), but sources reflect coverage for Parks' book, Covenant, Marriage Bootcamp, and the upcoming RH Ultimate Girls' Trip. It would be confusing and bad journalistic practice for these sources to not mention that Parks did nine seasons of RHOA, but this does not mean that the sources are only reflective of Parks' time on that show. Subject has sustained coverage over a decade, which strongly suggests notability. Meets
WP:GNG by
People article (per
WP:RSP, "There is consensus that People magazine can be a reliable source in biographies of living persons"),
EW coverage of RHOA, and
Philadelphia Tribune article.
Samsmachado (
talk) 19:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs) 11:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep the number of reviews for her book seem to smash
WP:NAUTHOR and GNG.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 03:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.