The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence of notability. Many refs are YouTube and all but one are passing mentions. A quasi interview is way below the line for notability . Fails
WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 17:25, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - multiple awards and a few articles. It's not a lot, but it's enough. -
Kenirwin/(
talk) 15:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep I added some additional citations to her article and I believe she passes
WP:GNG for significant discussion in secondary sources.
Lonehexagon (
talk) 05:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep I can only agree with the opinions already expressed, the article should be kept.
ZeR0101MiNt (
talk) 18:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - per improvements with additional refs.
BabbaQ (
talk) 22:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.