The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep While I'd have gone delete, the multiple mentions of him with regard to sanctions, I suspect, make him a geopolitical figure and get him past WP:GNG - "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability" Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk) 10:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
perhaps. a profound review of each source is needed in that case. but, I still think he's not so big a geopolitical figure. Maybe, he could be merged with his father. His father is indeed a geopolitical figure.
Bash7oven (
talk) 11:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 07:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment still no reliable sources there. His father is a famous figure, so it would be wise to merge into his father's page:
Mikhail Fradkov --
Bash7oven (
talk) 12:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep Major apparatchik insider type. Easily notable. Significant coverage. Enemy of the west. scope_creepTalk 21:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Some additional, pre-2022 coverage can be found when searching for close variants of his name (e.g.
Pyotr).
Pegnawl (
talk) 19:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.