The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{( spin me / revolutions)} 16:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Peter Van den Bossche

Peter Van den Bossche (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

apparent puff piece with hall mark external links to various sites with which the subject is associated. Sources largely primary or from commercial sites. Edaham ( talk) 03:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Edaham ( talk) 03:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment Created by a user with an apparent COI, this piece makes use of in-body external links, is sourced only from the sites with which the subject is affiliated etc. Additionally I've draftified the page World_Trade_Institute, which had been (unbelievably) passed - untagged by a NPP, despite being woefully sourced only from the WTI website and being a similarly COIed puff piece - an oversight I hope. Suggest that those involved be strongly discouraged from creating pages about or affiliated with this institution and its employees. Edaham ( talk) 03:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 03:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 03:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 07:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 07:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete a horrifically-formatted article, with no independent references or clear claim of meeting WP:NPROF. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 03:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.