The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Peter Bowsher

Peter Bowsher (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a full High Court judge. A lawyer who has received an appointment that indicates pre-eminence within the profession, such as Queen's Counsel, shall be treated in the same manner as a person who satisfies criteria 1 of WP:ANYBIO. However meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Uhooep ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Local judge, nothing to suggest satisfying any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete Suffers from WP:O; no reliable sources present to establish any notability of this person. The world can be a perfect happy place without this article. Regards, Jeff5102 ( talk) 12:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.