The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect as per DerbyCountyinNZ and Jbhunley
NealeFamily (
talk) 03:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Diplomats are not entitled to keep unsourced or
primary sourced articles — they certainly qualify for Wikipedia articles if they're the subject of enough
reliable source coverage to satisfy
WP:GNG, but they do not get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist. But with the only source here being a deadlinked directory listing on DFAIT's own website, GNG has not been met. Redirect to the list per basically everybody who's commented so far; no prejudice against recreation in the future if real sourcing starts showing up.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.