The result was no consensus. It seems here that there are two different grounds on what should happen with this article. Both sides have a few strong points, and a few weak points. However, it doesn't seem to be weighted in one way or the other, so this is a NC closure. ( X! · talk) · @755 · 17:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
simple placeholder article does no good. Rasputin72 ( talk) 04:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply