The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete If this person is actually claiming to be heir to the Portuguese throne then he might be notable, but the article claims he supports the Duke of Braganza, and the claim that some people regard him as the rightful heir is completely unsourced.
PatGallacher (
talk) 01:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment, I don't vote Pedro. He doesn't even have a page in Portuguese yet so why one in English? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gregkaye (
talk •
contribs) 08:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 23:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)reply
tentative keep - If more sources can be produced to establish notability, I will vote to keep. Otherwise, delete.
Bali88 (
talk) 04:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)reply
There probably won't be any. The creator hasn't edited this article in while and nothing substantial has been added about him nor can anyone find reliable sources to support his notability. Whatever relevant information can be merged to
Duke of Loulé.--
The Emperor's New Spy (
talk) 02:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.