- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ansh 666 04:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Peanut (video gamer)
- Peanut (video gamer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable video gamer, Apparently best known for involved in non-notable (and so redlinked) competitions. With no references, does not satisfy general notability or any other notability guideline.
Could be tagged for BLPPROD, but that could probably be addressed, so let's go with AFD.
Google search does not turn up this person, but many video games based on Peanuts, the comic. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 16:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - no indication of notability, unsourced BLP. -
Zanhe (
talk) 23:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Neither of those are reasons for speedy deletion. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 23:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Nearly-unsourced, non-notable BLP. The article itself is also a mess, but that could be fixed if the subject was notable, which isn't the case.
I'd suggest a BLPPROD, I really can't imagine any objections to this.Nanophosis ( talk) 03:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)- BLPPROD is for cases when exactly ZERO sources are cited, which is not the case here. So there would indeed be an objection. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 13:16, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Understood, thank you. I still suggest deletion, but have revoked my support for a BLPPROD. Nanophosis ( talk) 15:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.