The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment I was under the impression that the CNBC and VOA coverage was enough to demonstrate notability, although I agree that the article reads much like an ad. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment, as an AfD we could agree to remove it under
WP:G11 grounds, if we thought it was of that level.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 10:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)reply
No comment on notabiliy for time being, but it can be moved to draft if we want for cleanup. Thanks,L3X1◊distænt write◊ 02:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment, i have cleaned up the article a bit and added more neutral info as well as removng content that could be seen as promotional
scottledeuce (
talk) 19:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)reply
oppose/keep, the article can be made more neutral but i think its worty or mention just for hte recent links and press and publicity of backpage connections and mentions
Note to closing Admin The last !vote was made from an Estonian IP address, most probably related to the subject.
JMHamo (
talk) 20:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete as I think it likely meets the general notability guideline. I don't think it meets the more stringent
WP:CORPDEPTH guideline, though, as there are just a few reliable articles that fit that bill.
71.163.163.163 (
talk) 22:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete: There are two sources I was able to find, both of which are being used in the page, that are reliable and could establish notability. As it stands however, the article reads like an advertisement.
Dr-Bracket (
talk) 13:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 15:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.