The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
RL0919 (
talk) 03:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Article about a real estate investor that does not establish
biographical notability. The article contains minimal information, and basically says that he is a real estate investor. Naïve Google search finds that he uses social media, and has publicized himself well. (If there were secondary coverage, it would be hard to weed out from his advertising.) A check of the references shows, again, that he generates publicity for himself. Five of the six references are interviews, and one is written by him. There is no independent coverage in the article. There is no secondary coverage in the article.
Number
Reference
Remarks
Independent
Significant
Reliable
Secondary
1
Businessworld.in
An interview
No
Yes
No
2
Zeenews.india.com
Another interview, reads like a puff piece
No
Yes
No
3
Financialexpress.com
An article by the subject
No
Yes
No
4
Republicnewsindia.com
An interview that reads like a press release
No
Yes
No
5
Rdtimes.in
Another interview that reads like a press release
No
Yes
No
6
Theindianbulletin.com
A piece that uses the first person plural
No
Yes
No
He may or may not be notable, but if he is notable, a neutral editor should start from the beginning, not from this article.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 00:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment One anonymous column in the International Business Times India written by their "Entertainment Desk", various other hits, not sure that adds up to notability.
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, non-notable PR junk. Note that I have removed three of the refs: "republicnewsindia", "rdtimes", and "theindianbulletin". All three are junk blogs pretending to be news sources, and are run by the same SEO scammer.
Kuru(talk) 20:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Nothing I can see in Hindi as well, besides the usual paid puff pieces. Fails
WP:BIO by a long, long way. JavaHurricane 08:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Lacks independent coverage to meet GNG --
Ab207 (
talk) 15:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.