The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete-- Anthony Bradbury ^"talk" 13:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Paulina James

Paulina James (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards, just nominations. Little or no independent reliable sourcing. No relevant nontrivial GBooks hits. Almost entirely dependent on promotional sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. ( talk) 18:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete fails WP:BASIC lack of coverage and only nominations for the awards so that the pornbio guideline is not passed Atlantic306 ( talk) 04:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete, no major awards nor any other notable presence in the media, so she clearly fails WP:PORNBIO. -- fdewaele, 18 August 2016, 15:32 CET.
• Delete been there, done that didn't want the teeshirt. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Fails GNG without non-trivial coverage by independent reliable sources. Fails PORNBIO without significant award wins. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete -- trivial award and no significant RS coverage. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete -- fails even minor indicia of notability. Montanabw ^(talk) 07:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete totally fails the low notability threshold for pornographic actors. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 08:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 ^Talk 22:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.