The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--
Ymblanter (
talk) 05:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Short CV with no assertion of notability other than his work is widely cited. This would pass, if true, but WoS shows only 30 cummulative citations on 9 papers (h-index 4). So, I agree that this one is
WP:TOOSOON.
Agricola44 (
talk) 16:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete. The only assertion of significance in the article is that his publications are well cited, but his
Google scholar profile shows citation numbers that do not bear this out (at least by the usual standards of academic deletion discussions here). I don't see any other evidence of passing one of the
WP:PROF criteria in his
academic bio nor of passing
WP:GNG for his non-academic work. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 04:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per above. Short of academic impact and not otherwise noteworthy.
Truth or consequences-2 (
talk) 14:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.