From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Paul Cabana

Paul Cabana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is not presumed notable according to WP:N and WP:NHOCKEY. -- K.Annoyomous (talk) 07:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 11:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 11:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Doesn't meet NHOCKEY and I can find nothing that satisfies GNG. - DJSasso ( talk) 12:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines. He played in the EIHL for a season - but classifying that as a 'top professional league' is probably pushing it. GLG GLG ( talk) 13:34, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: We don't classify the EIHL as a lower minor league, and it's light years away from "top professional"; its stars are folks who were second- and third-liners in the juniors, the ECHL and NCAA hockey. Ravenswing 20:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The ECHL is a lower-level league per WP:NHOCKEY/LA. This means that merely playing in the ECHL does not make him notable. If he achieved preeminent honours in the ECHL or college he could be notable per WP:NHOCKEY #4, but I can't find any evidence of such honours. Tchaliburton ( talk) 22:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY -- Clean-up-wiki-guy ( talk) 22:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.