The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Patrick A. Salvi

Patrick A. Salvi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously listed, still true: "The notability is in the cases they dealt with. Most of the references are about the cases, not about the firm. The others are mere notices of placement of various lists or appointments or minor local prizes. The article is indistinguishable from what law firms use for advertising." Calton | Talk 14:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Few mentions in passing, in-depth coverage limited to primary sources/press releases or otherwise COI-written. Not seeing how he passe NBIO. He is just a lawyer doing quite well for himself, but not reaching the notability required to be in an encyclopedia, IMHO. PS. Prior AfD closed as no-consensus due to no participation; pinging nominator of last AfD User:DGG.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Mentions in passing does meet WP:GNG. There must be sources about him. SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete too spammy to consider worth keeping. Wikipedia is not a resume hosting service or a client brochure. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.