- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Patricia Pine
- Patricia Pine ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon. This does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. Her other activities would not justify a stand alone article. Legacypac ( talk) 05:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps only if necessary but certainly redirect as there's not confidently enough for a solidly notable article as there could be. TNT at best for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners as suggested by the nom and for the usual reasons (cheap, plausible, etc.) - The Bushranger One ping only 11:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as a WP:GNG pass with, "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Ejgreen77 ( talk) 01:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- At the ovr 1 per minute rate Ejgreen77 is voting keep it is hard to believe they are evaluating the articles - and they Always vote keep on every pageant winner. This is a classic case of
WP:NTEMP where someone notable for only one event should not get an article.
Legacypac (
talk) 03:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, I did do evaluation before I voted. This AfD has been sitting open for nearly two weeks, so there was plenty of time to do it, and to assume otherwise is in very bad faith.
Ejgreen77 (
talk) 03:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ignoring all Wikipedia guidelines in AfD is bad faith. Suggesting you evaluated all these article and then went back and voted using the same words is hard to believe.
Legacypac (
talk) 03:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'll just point out that my redirect !votes were just as rapid and just as copy-pasted but didn't draw commentary... - The Bushranger One ping only
- Ignoring all Wikipedia guidelines in AfD is bad faith. Suggesting you evaluated all these article and then went back and voted using the same words is hard to believe.
Legacypac (
talk) 03:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, I did do evaluation before I voted. This AfD has been sitting open for nearly two weeks, so there was plenty of time to do it, and to assume otherwise is in very bad faith.
Ejgreen77 (
talk) 03:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- At the ovr 1 per minute rate Ejgreen77 is voting keep it is hard to believe they are evaluating the articles - and they Always vote keep on every pageant winner. This is a classic case of
WP:NTEMP where someone notable for only one event should not get an article.
Legacypac (
talk) 03:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The claim of notability is backed up by the range of sources needed to support the claim. Alansohn ( talk) 20:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Being Miss Oregon alone is not enough to pass notability. The sources do not pass GNG, and her roles on a local broadcast station and performing are not enough to pass notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 14:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 14:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The nominator states notability is not at issue, then argues about notability. Notability is at issue, and this one meets it. Keep. Jacona ( talk) 01:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- to clarify, notability is questionable, but following NOPAGE assumes notability. Legacypac ( talk) 02:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject doesn't have independent notability beyond "winner of Miss Oregon", and nothing suggests that she will see more than her 15 minutes of fame. Lithorien ( talk) 04:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for failing WP:ANYBIO and WP:JOURNALIST. Notability doesn't rise to having her own page. Blue Riband► 14:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.