- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Patricia Feerick
- Patricia Feerick ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see that the sources demonstrates that this person meets WP:PERP. j⚛e decker talk 00:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The fact that she is an attorney and was a defendant are both verifiable. Neither makes her notable according to my usual standards or WP:GNG. The stub appears to be some kind of hatchet job. Bearian ( talk) 20:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.