The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
MER-C 03:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Routine announcements or company-generated PR. While some references are from "reliable sources", there are no references that pass the criteria for establishing notability.
-- HighKing++ 12:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep The company has received press coverage from time-honored sources such as Wall St Journal and Chicago Tribune. If this is not notable then I don't know what is.
Hsypark (
talk) 21:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete This was exceedingly likely to have been created by a blocked sock per
[1]. It is also kind of spammy.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 22:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as an advertisement. And it doesn't meet
WP:CORPDEPTH. Closing a round of funding is not notable.
Rentier (
talk) 23:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete violates our terms of use, also reports are just 'everyday' coverage and doesn't meet
WP:CORPDEPTH.
jcc (
tea and biscuits) 10:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: per Jcc. No big deal, no depth, no place on wikipedia.
Toddst1 (
talk) 13:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, not a unique service and is a promo piece; fails
WP:Corp.
Kierzek (
talk) 17:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.