- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 21:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Palgwatang
- Palgwatang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Source searches are providing almost nothing to verify the existence of this, other than the single source in the article. Furthermore, the toic has not received significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. Does not meet WP:N. North America 1000 01:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete for having a very souped up claim on notability. - The Gnome ( talk) 12:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. The author posted a comment on the article's talk page: [1]. They suggested that Chinese sources on 八卦湯 may exist. Which is possible, but I don't read Chinese to verify that. (Also this might be more a Chinese dish than Korean dish in that case...). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ( speak to me) 00:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ( speak to me) 00:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Weak oppose: I think it is a Korean food from the 23rd episode of Dae Jang Geum. And I found some Korean sources for this food #1 (by Health Chosun) and #2 (by KISTI) etc. Thanks. -- Garam ( talk) 12:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to allow editors evaluation of Garam's proposed sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Relisted to allow editors evaluation of Garam's proposed sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 21:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.