- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 23:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Palao, Canlubang
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Palao, Canlubang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Satisfies WP:GEOLAND. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 19:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @ David.moreno72 and Rsrikanth05: If you haven't noticed, sitios are not political subdivisions like barangays, that we presume to be notable. If you are going to tell me that these are notable because it satisfies the holy "WP:GEOLAND", you are mistaken because they are not the same thing. We can't even monitor barangays, and yet we'd still include sitios? And furthermore it has been done by a sockpuppeteer.-- hueman1 (talk) 10:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - under WP:GEOLAND, articles must meet WP:GNG and this articles does not meet "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - not notable enough for a stand-alone article - Epinoia ( talk) 15:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Practically all of the keep !votes here point to WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Palao falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. — seav ( talk) 13:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.