The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable, fails
WP:GNG. Refs found on GNews & GHits appear to be either PR releases or not from a
WP:RS. GregJackPBoomer! 17:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete. My own GNews search returned mostly false positives. -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 18:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Note - I have tagged a portion of the article as a copyright issue as it has been lifted directly from a couple of pages of the Pacific Wild web site. --
Whpq (
talk) 16:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - I did find some sources covering their stance on the bear hunt;
[1],
[2] but I do not belevie teh coverage is sufficient to establish notability. --
Whpq (
talk) 16:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete Agree with Whpq. I found a few news articles quoting them about the "bears are starving" claims, but nothing at all ABOUT the group. Per
WP:CORPDEPTH, "quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources" do not count toward notability. --
MelanieN (
talk) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.