- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
PTC India
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PTC India ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The available sources do not establish notability per NCORP; some links are spam Tls9-me ( talk) 08:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood ( talk) 09:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Key player in India’s power market. It is a WP:LISTED entity with significant non-controlling interest from major Indian PSUs along with LIC and mutual funds. Deletion should never be an option, since a lot of public money and public interest in involved, inevitably tying it to the Indian economy. It along with it's NBFC subsidiary (PTC India Financial Services which is categorised as a systemically important NBFC by the Reserve Bank of India [1]) have been in the focus of a lot of misgovernnace related issues. [2] [3]. Few excerpts from a very detailed article in The Ken, "In domestic short-term power trading, PTC India had 45% market share at the end of the year ended March 2022...", "PTC India claims a 47% market share in international bilateral power trading between India and neighbouring countries." [4]. A lot of scope for expansion. — hako9 ( talk) 16:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 11:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - added more refs, should be notable per Hako9. - Indefensible ( talk) 17:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.