- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 04:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
PP Reddy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PP Reddy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is heavily reliant on REFBOMBING. The information currently available on the subject is limited and does not meet the criteria for general notability. Akevsharma ( talk) 16:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Akevsharma ( talk) 16:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep [1] [2] [3] (the first two are already in the article) are enough for GNG. House Blaster talk 19:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: I found enough evidences about the subject. Passes WP:GNG. GuildGM ( talk) 13:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: GuildGM itself is the creator of the article Akevsharma ( talk) 14:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two contributions since the relist haven't changed the state of this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 19:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)- Delete the DNA India and the second article are both brief mentions, barely half a page. DNA website is full of clickbait articles, I'm doubting reliability. I don't find much more for sourcing, other than confirmation that he's rich. Simply being rich isn't GNG.
Oaktree b (
talk) 20:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- and the India Herald (link 3 given above in the HouseBlaster comment above) is also full of spammy links and articles. They all paraphrase one another, farmer's son's wealth increases to Rs 33,000. The pop-up ads on the site are larger than this "article", which also makes me doubt it's a RS. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the DNA India and the second article are both brief mentions, barely half a page. DNA website is full of clickbait articles, I'm doubting reliability. I don't find much more for sourcing, other than confirmation that he's rich. Simply being rich isn't GNG.
Oaktree b (
talk) 20:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Currently listed citations are enough to pass WP:GNG. Also agrees with HouseBlaster comment. Misterrrrr ( talk) 15:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Oaktree b's assessment is persuasive. Indian news media are often unreliable when it comes to flattering coverage of prominent people, see Paid news in India. Sandstein 22:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.