- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 15:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
PDGREPPE
- PDGREPPE ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ineligible for PROD due to previous de-PROD. Can't find any WP:RS to show it passes WP:GNG. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete alas, it might be nice to cover historical technology, but this seems to have been a niche technology? Cannot think of where it could be merged either. W Nowicki ( talk) 22:54, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Crossin 12:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Crossin 12:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete no claim of notability. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.