The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I do not object against a redirect or merger but in itself this NGO cannot be a standalone as it doesn’t meet
WP:NGO & because they grossly lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (
talk) 23:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 00:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all I could find is passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG.
LibStar (
talk) 03:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.