The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that the article should be kept in some form. If editors wish to pursue a merger into Outline of Apple Inc. then that can be the subject of a subsequent merge discussion. TerriersFan ( talk) 00:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC) reply
I removed Apple-related so-called "outline" articles, as they served no function being EXACT repeats of the info on other main topic articles as well as info box templates clearly existing with the same info laid out identically on them too. They featuring absolutely no additional information, no new purpose, and all had the low merit template or similar on them accordingly. All the info on them was already given in exactly the same form on other main Apple-related pages, as should have ben checked before creation by checking pre-existing pages listed on the mass of Apple templates first (see here: User:Jimthing/Apple). Unless there is a clear reason for their existence —when they feature identical info found on another page on the WP— they shouldn't be created. Not all subjects need to have such "outline" pages, when other pages already exist for several years that clearly happen to already do the exact same purpose. -- Jimthing ( talk) 22:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC) reply