The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Promotional of what, exactly?
WenaRamiro (
talk) 11:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)reply
"Promotional of what" - SEO effort to promote non-notable documentary using Wikipedia. Prior to
this edit, it had a direct quote from the film's website in the first line of the lead.
Editorial tone was also problematic .
Acousmana (
talk) 14:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't see how redacting an article of a news-worthy topic in a "problematic" sense makes the article non-notable.
WenaRamiro (
talk) 20:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I'm in an agreement with
WenaRamiro.
Acousmana, please analyze it in regards of how it fails
WP:GNG or
WP:NFO. As I see it the subject of this article might be able to pass
WP:GNG...
Kolma8 (
talk)
per
WP:GNG, re:"significant coverage", OK best reference used is NY Times and that's only a passing mention, after that Salon and Daily Beast as about equal in terms of
WP:RS, the rest, especially 'Small Screen', are low quality and should be dumped. Trivial mentions in weak sources like Daily Kos and Pique do nothing for notability. If the subject is as notable as claimed, there should be more high quality sources provided.
Acousmana (
talk) 15:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I found those four that are worth mentioning: [
[1]], [
[2]], [
[3]], [
[4]]. All of them might be "significant", but none are "reliable" IMO.
Kolma8 (
talk) 21:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete per above.
Kolma8 (
talk) 21:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 01:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per above, routine GNG failure.
SK2242 (
talk) 01:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.