The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I am not persuaded by the keep vote, which is essentially a "yesinherited" argument. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 01:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)reply
delete No claim of notability either for the parish or the building. It seems a run-of-the-mill mid-1900s parish.
Mangoe (
talk) 04:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SIGCOV,
WP:MILL, and
my standards. The building is less than 100 years old (1959), is not a Historic Site in the jurisdiction, is not distinguished for its structure or designer, has no notable congregants, is not notable for its music programme, is not a major site of pilgrimage nor synod, and zero sources online exist about weddings or other liturgical events there. If
you want to be kind, redirect to
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Harare.
Bearian (
talk) 19:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - funeral for Trudy Stevenson, a notable ambassador was held here. It could possibly be merged into the college 650 meters away if it cannot be kept.--
Epiphyllumlover (
talk) 05:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.