The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - I de-prodded it to give us a few more days to check on its notability, which according to the nom, is correct; this journal is not notable. It has almost no citations on the two largest social science databases.
Bearian (
talk) 20:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)reply
PS: it is quite normal for law reviews to be edited by students. In fact, almost all US law reviews are student-edited. I don't know much about what makes a law journal notable, though, so for the moment I'm abstaining from !voting. --
Guillaume2303 (
talk) 17:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment - I have found the following source in Google Books: Political and Social Science Journals: A Handbook for Writers and Reviewers. ABC-Clio, Inc. 1983.
Page 145 et seq.
James500 (
talk) 16:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.