The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't actually find any real, independent, reliable sources that discuss this organization in a meaningful way. The article is a COI/sock nightmare from the get-go, and you can go back through the history if you think I cut too much--but you won't find the kind of sourcing that proves notability per WP:CORP.
Drmies (
talk) 00:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - zero evidence of notability
Spiderone 12:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article does not satisfy
WP:ORGCRIT and exists only because the organisation itself created it. If there is real notability, let someone without a COI write a new article.
SuperMarioMan (
Talk) 19:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.