The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Kurykh (
talk) 01:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Not notable except for one YouTube interview. Other than that, this is a promotional article.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 03:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)reply
delete poorly sourced. Even if it was claims for notability are weak.
LibStar (
talk) 07:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.