The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JForget 00:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)reply
This edit is another example of the site being promoted by the same editor.
I42 (
talk) 18:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment: Article presently reads like a copy-paste from another source. --
A More Perfect Onion (
talk) 18:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)reply
It is. Unambiguous copyvio of
[1]. I've tagged it accordingly.—
S MarshallTalk/
Cont 18:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Whoops, I made a mistake. On further checking, the first paragraph is an unambiguous copyvio, but the rest of it is not. Untagged.—
S MarshallTalk/
Cont 18:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Not entirely. The statistics quoted from FreeShipping.org are copy-pasted wholesale from
http://www.freeshipping.org/statistics, which is footnoted as a reference. But copy-paste is hardly a ref. Therefore, Delete as copy-paste, copyvio of multiple sources. --
A More Perfect Onion (
talk) 15:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. Veiled spam. Non-notable subject. Essay. Etc. —
RHaworth(
talk·contribs) 01:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. all of the above--
Hu12 (
talk) 18:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.