The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gregory Dark per WP:ATD-R. So Why 07:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Object of Obsession

Object of Obsession (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alts:

type:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

year:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. Fails WP:NF. SL93 ( talk) 01:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 ( talk) 01:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete fails WP:NFILM, no coverage. Article makes no claim to notability, consists solely of a plot summary. -- Bejnar ( talk) 21:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to director Gregory Dark as one of his works. If some 23-year-old coverage comes forward, it can always be returned and sourced. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.