The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Article has been edited to conform to Wikipedia's neutrality policy
User:Dinovate (
talk)
Keep. Doesn't seem too promotional to me in its current form since its cleanup-- no external links, most information is sourced, seems like a fairly straightforward stub. Needs copyediting and the addition of some references, but a quick Google search (especially using 'news') provides many reliable sources (Forbes, Guardian, BBC News).
Gilded Snail (
talk) 01:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not notable. Doesn't meet
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO. The
Forbes 30 Under 30 lists 600 people per year, which is not exclusive enough to confer notability on someone on its own. — Newslingertalk 21:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Pleasures Magazine: Not significant or reliable. Insignificant coverage from a magazine without named writers.
From the sources not cited in the article, I found one article in
Pulse.ng that may qualify, although I'm not sure about the reliability of that website since they don't provide information on their staff. However, one article isn't enough to satisfy
WP:GNG. — Newslingertalk 21:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keepdouble vote striked Not promotional. Sources quoted are reliable from my research.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Yunshui雲水 09:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: does not meet
WP:ANYBIO; promotional article for a nn businessman.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 01:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: This article seems moderate, isn't promotional in any way. Besides, all claims are sourced. In my opinion, and as a Nigerian, I'll say the
Pulse.ng article is relible (cited it)
Geekdidi (
talk) 01:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 21:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep looks like it meets GNG to me. -
Scarpy (
talk) 21:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: As not
notableBLP. One of the Forbes entries states that in a two year period with 24 employees Okeke (or his company) made $170,000. There is just not enough notability for an article that is of encyclopedic interest. Expanding the article is noble but 3 or 4 references from the same (Forbes) or closely related sources does not add to notability. If we lower the notability bar to a CEO of a small company (34 employees) and miniscule income ($170,000), we might as well do away with notability requirements and submit to
advertising for small companies and owners. Being a BLP there should be no question of source reliability or subject notability. Just because there is some sourcing should not mean an automatic article.
Otr500 (
talk) 14:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment[1] - I am merely bringing this up for analysis, I have no idea if this is a reliable source.
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 20:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.