The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A 2014 no consensus under a very different period of school notability. A current BEFORE shows up nothing other than information that it would offer in person classes in 2021 and mentions that a subject interviewed
[1] had a child who went there. This was substantively the same issue as at the AFD when this thin sourcing countered the "schools are notable" default at the time. Sourcing then and now is thin: its basketball team
wins games and of course a local paper covers it.
This is probably the best source, but it's neither significant nor in depth coverage about the school to meet current standards for notability.
StarM 01:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, while I am usually in favor of keeping public high schools, private high schools (imo) have a higher bar of notability. This school just seems like a small private school that happens to teach any of the 9-12 grades. Add a sentence or two to
Janesville, Wisconsin#Education, but nothing more. JackFromReedsburg (
talk |
contribs) 13:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - I was leaning delete on this one last time around, 7 years ago, when our guidelines for school notability were even more lax than they are now. I just did a quick search for sources since then and don't see much. Please ping if you've found something that would satisfy
WP:NSCHOOL. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 13:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Not enough indepth coverage.
GooeyMitch (
talk) 15:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete if we want to be a truly global encyclopeida, we need to think like one. The level of sourcing on most high schools world wide and the will to create articles means that high school coverage is almost completely in countries that are at least a little English-speaking, and almost non-existent for the rest of the world. We should at least expect articles to meet standard sourcing levels for institutions before we keep such articles.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 20:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.