From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC(talk) 06:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Northwestern European Canadians

Northwestern European Canadians (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Including also:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwestern European people These articles are based novel synthesis and totally pointless. "Northwest european ancestry" is not specified in the official demographic surveys of these countries, and the included material is better covered in the articles of the more specific ancestries that constitute the synthesised concept of "Northwest european". Hemiauchenia ( talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC) reply
@ LaundryPizza03: There's a lot more than that, see their userlinks page. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 03:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This obviously isn't the first time, either on here or in the real world, that people have tried to reify whiteness into a unifying cultural identity that transcends nationality, but it's not working. As I've pointed out before, white people don't need to cling to our Europeanness as a central principle of our identities per se, because we largely get the privilege of already knowing exactly where our ancestors came from. We know if our ancestors were French or British or Irish or German or Polish or Swedish or Italian or Croatian. African-Americans, conversely, mostly don't have the luxury of knowing whether their ancestors came from Nigeria or Mali or the Congo or South Africa or Uganda, because slavery took that connection to their heritage away from them. So the generic label "African" is all that's actually available for most African-Americans to hang on to about their roots — but you don't need to cling to "European" as your central identity if you already know that your ancestors were specifically Dutch or Italian or Danish. So it's a false equivalency to insist that the existence of a thing called "African-American" mandates the parallel creation of a thing called "European-American", because "European" Americans already have easy access to much more specific and concrete details about our exact ancestral heritages than most African Americans ever will. White fragility sucks, and I'm a white guy saying that. Bearcat ( talk) 19:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all per nom, this concept does not exist. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 08:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.